News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Forget expediency - give voters some vision 

Forget expediency - give voters some vision

01 Mar, 2011 03:00 AM

NSW is a state that doesn't change its mind often. It is one of the world's most stable, indeed perhaps sclerotic democracies, with only four changes of government in the past 70 years.

Such stability should lead to governments that think about the long term, not the next election. Unfortunately, that hasn't been the case. Governments have failed to plan and, when they have planned, they have failed to deliver.

With a change of government in the wind, this election promises to be the most significant in a generation. Although the Liberal and National parties need a near record swing to win government, opinion polls - including the Herald/Nielsen poll - predict they will win comfortably.

If they win, it will be because of the overwhelming dissatisfaction of the people of NSW with the Labor Party, not because of the attractions of a sweeping reform agenda from the Coalition.

The Labor Party seems to have run out of ideas. So far, it has promised little beyond an election handout to help those struggling with higher power bills - increases for which it must take responsibility. It has only a few weeks to convince voters it doesn't deserve a thorough drubbing at the polls.

The Coalition appears likely to win government without a mandate for bold change - largely because it isn't asking for one. For understandable political reasons, it has minimised the extent of its promises and the detail of them.

But this represents a lost opportunity. NSW should not settle for business as usual under new management.

In many areas, NSW has lost its way. Big issues - such as how the state government can fund growing health expenditure - transcend politics. The politics of the ''small target strategy'' underestimates the intelligence of the voters. They understand that government is about something more than election handouts and that, occasionally, there should be painful change in order to have better government. The people of NSW are ready for change.

Last year the Herald conducted an independent inquiry into transport. Today we tackle issues the politicians aren't keen to talk about - how to afford the public transport we desperately need; what needs to be done in the hospitals (not which level of government pays for it); and addressing the real needs of public schools.

Sydney's population is growing. Nothing will stop that. The new government needs to look beyond the next election and tackle the issues of a growing population - what sort of city Sydney will be in 20 years; where will these extra people live; how will ordinary people such as nurses and teachers afford to buy a home?

Ross Gittins argues that the big question is not so much about managing the finances of the state but delivering services that improve quality of life - to cut waste without cutting quality.

These are some of the big questions that will confront whatever government is in power after March 26. It's not the Herald's role to endorse every idea contained within but to begin a conversation with you, both reader and voter.

That's what this publication is about. The Herald is the marketplace of ideas - about Sydney, about the shape of our lives, about the future. Read, think and tell us your ideas.

Peter Fray is the publisher and editor-in-chief of the Herald.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Most popular articles




Monash Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...