News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Gamblers spend less as pokie numbers cut 

Gamblers spend less as pokie numbers cut

30 Jun, 2008 01:00 AM
REMOVING 165 poker machines last year from venues in the municipality of Monash has put the brakes on the amount gamblers are spending on pokies, Victorian Commission of Gambling Regulation figures show.

But groups worried about problem gambling doubt whether the slowdown will stop compulsive gambling. The State Government in 2006 ordered

poker machine venues in Chadstone, Mulgrave, Oakleigh and Clayton to reduce their pokies by December 18 last year. As a result, the number of machines in Monash municipality dropped by 165, from 1150 to 985.

In January-April, poker machine spending dropped by 7per cent compared with the same time last year - halting a steady rise in spending by gamblers over the past five years. The Matthew Flinders Taverner in Chadstone bore a quarter of the Monash area poker machine cuts, removing 46 of its 105 machines.

The venue has applied to the VCGR to boost its poker machine numbers to 80, a move that Monash Council opposes.

Ross Blair-Holt, director of the ALH Group which manages the venue, wouldn't reveal how much revenue the business had lost, but said the losses didn't threaten it.

"We're hurt, but all the venues are affected out there. If people can't get on their favourite machine, they will go somewhere else.''

Monash Electronic Gaming Taskforce chairwoman Joy Banerji said it was "more than a coincidence'' that there was an impact on gaming revenue

since the Matthew Flinders Taverner's poker machine numbers were nearly halved.

"From what I gather, that particular venue was generating quite an amount of revenue.''

But Cr Banerji didn't think regional caps were curbing problem gambling.

"I'm still a bit sceptical about caps.

"People who have control of their [gambling] behaviour will find something else to do, but someone who's really hooked on it will find somewhere else to gamble.''

Gambler's Help Eastern manager Bernie Durkin said the spending drop wasn't significant.

"What we know is that roughly 50per cent of people gambling around poker machines at any one time have a problem with their gambling.

"About a 5 per cent drop doesn't feel like enough.''

Interchurch Gambling Taskforce spokesman Mark Zirnsak said factors such as rising petrol prices could be having an effect on pokies spending.

Government spokesman Michael Sinclair said regional caps were an important part of the Government's overall strategy to combat problem gambling.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Just like to quickly comment on this article.Firstly,a heroin addict is the same as a pokies addict,lowering the amount of dealers(pokiesmachines) wil not deter the addict finding the next fix,and it is laughable for the government to suggest this.The revenue drop is more than likely to be from recreational gamblers not being able to get on to the remaining machines because they are being used by probem gamblers.
Posted by Your Joking, 7/07/2008 5:16:38 PM
The revenue drop is almost certainly NOT the result of recreational gamblers being unable to get onto their favourite machine. Recreational gamblers make up 90% of all poker machine users but as they spend on average just $20 per session and gamble less than once a month, their contribution to total pokie profits is less than half the total. Pokie addicts (who make up 10% of all users) spend around $200 per session and gamble up to seven days a week. Quite clrearly, as heroin dealers don't make the majority of their money from recreational users, poker machine operators don't make the majority of their money from recreational gamblers. Research overseas (where actual player data is examined), shows that 90% of gambling machine profits come from 10% of users. Unfortunately, in Australia, researchers don't have access to actual player data and machine owners and so have to rely on player memory. Needless to say, operators in Australia are VERY keen to keep researchers and the government away from actual player spend data. Sue Pinkerton Problem Gambling Research Consultant President of Duty of Care inc
Posted by Sue Pinkerton, 15/07/2008 8:09:02 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Monash Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...