News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Baby debate: local MPs split on abortion reform 

Baby debate: local MPs split on abortion reform

25 Aug, 2008 01:58 PM
MONASH MPs Maxine Morand and Daniel Andrews last week were at the centre of moves to decriminalise abortion while other Monash MPs were absorbing the detail of the reform.

Ms Morand, as Women's Affairs and Children's Minister, and Mr Andrews, as Health Minister, were the chief architects of a bill tabled last week to remove abortion from the Crimes Act.

Of the five other Monash MPs, only Oakleigh MP Ann Barker has so far publicly backed the bill.

The proposed law would allow terminations up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with the stipulation for later-term pregnancies that two doctors must decide if the termination is appropriate.

The bill is expected to be debated next month and government MPs will be allowed to vote according to their conscience rather than on party lines.

Last week, Ms Morand addressed fears the law might lead to an increase in the number of abortions..

"In the [Victorian Law Reform Commission] report they articulated there hasn't been any evidence that the laws affect the number of pregnancies, that the abortion rate is relative to contraception and other reasons."

Mr Andrews said the bill would reflect current clinical practice, but he was reluctant to give examples of how the bill would work in practice.

"It's not for me to canvas what would be appropriate and what wouldn't be.

"None of us as lawmakers can know the very fine detail, the complex and traumatic circumstances that the woman may present the carer."

Scoresby MP Kim Wells, who opposes the bill, was concerned that doctors with a conscientious objection might be obliged to perform emergency abortions. He was also concerned by the lack of mandatory counselling for women seeking abortions.

"The majority of people within my electorate who have contacted me have been opposed to the bill.

"Of those living outside my electorate who have contacted me, opinions have been split approximately 50/50."

Fertility control clinical pathologist Susie Allanson, though disappointed that a less restrictive proposal wasn't offered, said the bill was a "wonderful step forward for women" and would help to "destigmatise the industry". She said the bill could be a "once-in-a-lifetime chance".

"It may be as good as it gets, but it's still very good if you consider 94.6 per cent of terminations are prior to 13 weeks and less than 1 per cent are after 20 weeks ... though that small percentage includes some very difficult and sad cases."

Tell the Truth Coalition did not respond to the Journal's calls.

HOW THEY LINE UP:

Kim Wells (Liberal), Scoresby: Against:

"I am convinced the existing Menhennitt Ruling, which applies to the legality of abortion in Victoria, has served the state well. I am deeply concerned the new bill, if passed, will lead to an increase in the number of abortions performed in Victoria."

Ann Barker (ALP), Oakleigh: For:

"No further comment."

Hong Lim (ALP), Clayton: "No comment."

Bob Stensholt (ALP), Burwood: Still considering.

Kirstie Marshall (ALP), Forest Hill: Still considering.

"This is a complex issue and I want to make sure the bill strikes the right balance before I decide which way to vote, so I will carefully consider its content."

What do you think? Write to journal@fairfaxmedia.com.au

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I believe passing a legislative bill that condones abortion is an afront to the gift of life. Life is not a random phenomena. There is a plan and a purpose for each life. The intricate design of the human body negates random theorists. Each organ has a specific role contributing to the function of the body as a whole. We were created. To abort this creation in the name of 'rights' or 'choice' is to demean not only life but the One who created the life
Posted by Tracey, 1/09/2008 7:06:10 PM
Great news for the culture of death! Not since Adolph Hitler have we had such an opportunity to depersonalize a whole class of human beings at a stroke. Surely the insane elderly and mentally handicapped should come next in line. We should have the choice to be free of their burdens, and do what we want with our own bodies and our own money without those parasites hanging off us. It's a banner day for death! Bring it on!!
Posted by Darth Vader, 11/09/2008 2:32:21 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
25 August, 2008

Most popular articles




Monash Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...