Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Leaders face drama of rewarding their political victims 

Leaders face drama of rewarding their political victims

After nearly three months hunkered down in their electorates, Labor and Coalition MPs have descended on Canberra for their first full party room meetings since Parliament rose back in June.

And what a topsy turvy day this will prove to be for the major political parties.

The man who ''lost'' the election, Tony Abbott has been hailed as the conquering hero by an elated Coalition joint party room.

He then introduced one by one the many new Liberal and National MPs who defeated Labor incumbents, including the first indigenous lower house MP, Ken Wyatt, and the youngest-ever federal MP, the 20-year-old Wyatt Roy.

The woman who ''won'' the election, Julia Gillard, was greeted with whoops and congratulations from Labor MPs. New Labor MPs - including the first Muslim member Ed Husic – were also formally welcomed, although this was a less time-consuming item of business than down the corridor in the Opposition party room.

But despite the air kisses for Gillard at the start of the Labor caucus meeting, once the party room doors were closed, she would have presumably warned her comrades of the enormous challenges to come.

Gillard's overarching challenge for the next three years - if the minority government lasts that long - is to acquire the mantle of political legitimacy after the deadlocked election result.

If yesterday's first day wobbles between the new government and the independent MPs over tax policy are a sign of things to come, Gillard and other senior ministers will struggle to manage the political agenda.

For some time to come, any utterances by the two independent MPs, Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott, which do not gel perfectly with the government's policy positions, will be parsed as signs of instability and uncertainty.

The government will not be able to send ministers out into the news cycle to slap down the independents.

But the independents also have a tricky balance to learn between formulating their own positions on policy issues and causing minor political panic by thinking out loud.

For Windsor and Oakeshott have staked their own local reputations on the risky decision to back Labor.

If it doesn't work out for Labor, it presumably won't work out for the independents.

After today's meetings wrap up, one of the immediate tasks for Gillard and Abbott will be assembling their new frontbenches.

There are tricky problems lurking here for both leaders, which are exacerbated by the tight numbers in the parliament, putting a premium on maintaining internal discipline.

Gillard has a factional mismatch between vacancies and candidates for ministerial positions.

There are at least three vacancies as a result of the resignation of Lindsay Tanner, and the decisions of John Faulkner and Alan Griffin to move to the backbench.

But all three of these vacancies come from Labor's Left faction while the up and comers in the Labor caucus, like Victorian MP Bill Shorten, come from the Right.

Then there is her promise to accommodate the man she toppled from the leadership, Kevin Rudd, (also from the Right) with a Cabinet position.

Rudd has his eyes on foreign affairs but that would require Gillard to push aside Stephen Smith.

Meanwhile on the Coalition side, Liberal MPs are already plotting over the carve-up of the non-spoils of opposition. A mini-push from Andrew Robb to challenge Julie Bishop for the position of Liberal Party deputy leader has been shelved.

But there will be three main issues for Abbott when he selects his frontbench in coming days.

Firstly, the economic team of shadow treasurer and shadow finance minister. Will he hold anyone accountable for the coalition's election costings schemozzle which was a factor in the independents' decision to back Labor.

Then there is the communications portfolio.

Attacking the government's National Broadband Network was a central part of Abbott's political strategy. Yet the opposition went into the election campaign without a policy. When it finally released one, it struggled to articulate an alternative.

Finally, like Gillard, Abbott has the quandary of what to do with his predecessor. He has promised Malcolm Turnbull a senior frontbench position.

There has been speculation Turnbull could be slotted into communications. But the former Liberal leader may have his eye on the shadow treasury post.

It's a topsy turvy world indeed where one of the trickiest problems for two incumbent leaders is how to accommodate the victims of their ascensions.

Mark Davis is the national editor of The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1




comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The most stupid thing Gillard would want to do is to reward the likes of Bill Shorten and Mark Arbib with a ministery remembering that those two coup-plotters are part of the problem within Labor rather than the solution. To me, there is no place for coup-plotters within a Government regardless of how many lessons Fiji's Frank Bainimarama may have provided them.
Posted by Henk Luf, 9/09/2010 2:51:16 PM
Keep an eye on stupidity Henk Luf, we ain't seen nuthin yet. Too clever by halves the true deceivers party.
Posted by John, 9/09/2010 7:35:30 PM
"including the first Muslim member Ed Husic". Lets get this right he is a non practicing Muslim. Secondly he is part of the electrical trades union - now that sounds pretty obvious to everyone doesn't it...All you need is another union hack in Labor! Gillard won by default so what's the big hype about? Anyone who thinks she won on merit need their heads read..She won only with the Greens and finally with the support of two hopeless independents who turned their backs on their own electorate...backstabbers more like it and worse because they failed the people in their own electorate...Can't see them lasting too long and what's the bet there will be another election before the 12 months! Windsor is a goose and as for Oakeshott what pathetic speech he delivered, couldn't have been any worse, self promoting himself right to the very last. How difficult was it for him to get those words out in the end! Yeah not pleasant and he knew it! Sold out his electorate and the country for a job offer..something he refused to take at the start.....there is no transparency with him either so he needs to stop kidding the people there was!
Posted by Gone before you know it, 10/09/2010 1:27:24 AM
So Oakeshott wants a Ministerial position in the Gillard Government after being unsuccessful in asking Premier Morris Iemma for one back in 2007 . Now we know why he left State Politics and he has put his friend Besseling in his old position now . Rob Oakeshott should tell the people of Lyne that he is a Labor man using the Independent hat as to deceive us ! I hope he is voted out at the next elections along with his mate in State Politics ! . ..
Posted by Jonno, 10/09/2010 10:13:22 AM
If it looks like a Duck, quacks like a Duck and swims with Ducks it is not unreasonable to call it a Duck.
Posted by John, 10/09/2010 10:56:22 AM
The title should have read `melodrama', befitting the fiasco of the last three months. The crucial question here is how we define the word independent, and whether, or not, it applies to the candidates who have recently aligned themselves with political parties. Does this mean that any of them can be won over with other promises and/or bribes? What, then, is the point of being classed as an independent?
Posted by Cheeba's Mum, 11/09/2010 11:16:28 AM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

Most popular articles




Monash Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...